ResearchCollectible prompt

NotebookLM literature review matrix from your papers

Compare the studies you uploaded in one cited matrix, then see where they agree, conflict, and leave gaps.

NotebookLMClaudeGemini

Curated by Nvoka

Nvoka wordmark logo
Nvoka wordmark logoResearch

NotebookLM literature review matrix from your papers

Using only the papers in this notebook, build a literature review matrix on {{review_topic}} to support {{project_or_thesis}}. Keep this guiding question in focus: {{guiding_question}}. Treat each paper as a separate source and cite it for every entry. If a paper does not report something, write not reported rather than inferring it, and do not bring in studies or facts from outside the notebook. The papers may be in more than one language; write the matrix in {{output_language}} and keep key terms in their original language next to the translation. Return: 1. A matrix with one row per paper: authors and year, aim, design and method, sample and setting, key findings, limitations, relevance to my question 2. Where the papers agree, with citations 3. Where they conflict, and likely reasons such as different samples, methods, or definitions 4. Gaps that no paper addresses 5. Themes to organize a written review around 6. The papers to read in full first, and why
Researchnvoka.com/library/nvoka-notebooklm-literature-review-matrixScan to open
Research

NotebookLM literature review matrix from your papers

Compare the studies you uploaded in one cited matrix, then see where they agree, conflict, and leave gaps.

Nvoka logo

Curated by Nvoka

NotebookLMClaudeGemini
Add to my library

Make it yours

Fill in the blanks and change any word. Only your copy changes, never the card.

Fill in the blanks

0 of 4 filled

Your prompt

Using only the papers in this notebook, build a literature review matrix on {{review_topic}} to support {{project_or_thesis}}. Keep this guiding question in focus: {{guiding_question}}. Treat each paper as a separate source and cite it for every entry. If a paper does not report something, write not reported rather than inferring it, and do not bring in studies or facts from outside the notebook. The papers may be in more than one language; write the matrix in {{output_language}} and keep key terms in their original language next to the translation. Return: 1. A matrix with one row per paper: authors and year, aim, design and method, sample and setting, key findings, limitations, relevance to my question 2. Where the papers agree, with citations 3. Where they conflict, and likely reasons such as different samples, methods, or definitions 4. Gaps that no paper addresses 5. Themes to organize a written review around 6. The papers to read in full first, and why
See all