WritingCollectible prompt
Grant proposal section that fits the funder's criteria
Act as an experienced grant writer. Draft the {{section_name}} section of a proposal to {{funder_name_or_program}}.
Funder guidelines and scoring criteria: {{funder_guidelines}}
Our project, data, and evidence: {{project_details_and_evidence}}
Rules:
- Answer every question and criterion in the guidelines, in the funder's order, using their key terms.
- Make outcomes specific and measurable, and link each activity to an outcome.
- Use only the data I provided. Where evidence is missing or weak, insert a clearly marked note saying what is needed. Do not invent statistics, partners, or results.
- Respect any word or character limit in the guidelines. If there is none, stay under 600 words.
- Write plainly for a busy reviewer, with short paragraphs and clear headings.
End with a checklist that maps each funder criterion to where the draft addresses it.
Writingnvoka.com/library/nvoka-grant-proposal-sectionScan to open
Writing
Grant proposal section that fits the funder's criteria
Draft a grant section that answers every funder criterion with evidence and measurable outcomes.
Curated by Nvoka
ClaudeChatGPTNotebookLM
Make it yours
Fill in the blanks and change any word. Only your copy changes, never the card.
Fill in the blanks
0 of 4 filledYour prompt
Act as an experienced grant writer. Draft the {{section_name}} section of a proposal to {{funder_name_or_program}}.
Funder guidelines and scoring criteria: {{funder_guidelines}}
Our project, data, and evidence: {{project_details_and_evidence}}
Rules:
- Answer every question and criterion in the guidelines, in the funder's order, using their key terms.
- Make outcomes specific and measurable, and link each activity to an outcome.
- Use only the data I provided. Where evidence is missing or weak, insert a clearly marked note saying what is needed. Do not invent statistics, partners, or results.
- Respect any word or character limit in the guidelines. If there is none, stay under 600 words.
- Write plainly for a busy reviewer, with short paragraphs and clear headings.
End with a checklist that maps each funder criterion to where the draft addresses it.